I will probably call Glock to see about this in case I need to replace a housing mechanism for a customer.I just checked with Glock Inc., and the Glock 19 Gen 5 will have the 30274 ejector installed on the trigger mechanism housing (TMH) while the Glock 19X will come with the 47021 ejector installed on the TMH. I also need to add that my Gen 4 Glock 19 also has a Trigger Mechanism Housing (old stye, no included trigger spring) with 30274 ejector. In fact it lists the Trigger Mechanism Housing (trigger spring included) with 33854 ejector for the Gen 5 Glock 19 and the Trigger Mechanism Housing with 30275 ejector for the Gen 4 Glock 19. I checked the Glock Armorer's Parts Order Form, and neither of those two housings with those ejectors are available for Gen 5. My Glock 19X has the Trigger Mechanism Housing (trigger spring included) with the 47021 ejector. My first BTF chunker was a Gen 2 17, second was a 2009 17L.My Glock 19 Gen 5 has the Trigger Mechanism Housing (trigger spring included) with 30274 ejector. Gen 2s had problems just like the new ones. My gen 2 has that 90* shoulder, while my gen 3's have the angled shoulder.ĮTA: I'm not sure why Glock would have changed that, as there were no issues with the 90* early type (gen 1-2).They've been trying to get that janky extractor to work since day one. just checked my 2 pin G19 gen 2, and that would be correct. Need more expertise on this subject from experienced Glock armorers/shooters. If you read the product Q&A at that link, the question is asked about fitting into a Gen 3 and the answer is yes, but no for Gen 4.Ĭorrect me if I'm wrong but the only 2 differences between this and the current OEM SP01895 (15 degree, MIM) is that the older model extractor at the link (Part #98) has a 90 degree face (to mate with the 90 degree cut on older model slides) and it is machined from bar stock. I am really hoping this issue has been addressed on the Gen 5 guns. I guess my next step may be an extractor swap. Having said that, neither pistol has what I would define as repeatable ejection, but at least the brass isn't going to my face. It helped both pistols, but it seemed to help the 17 more than the 34. I tested my G17.4 and G34.4 with the new 47021 ejectors installed. Let us know how the Suarez extractor works out for you. I'll try it out this week and post an update. Before I try the 47021, I replaced the OEM extractor with a Suarez "Extreme Reliability" billet one. Swapped out the 336 ejector for the 30274. Tried the $55 Apex Extractor and thought it helped but the more I shot it I realized it really wasn't any better. I've been experimenting with 3 different Poly80 builds (two 19's and one 26)I thought I had the first 19 fixed with the 30274 ejector but it was still giving brass to face. CHECK YOUR CASE SPACE UNDER THE EJECTOR!! It's NOT right, and I've swapped back to the Gen 4 ejector and all is well again. but I do NOT recommend running the G5 ejector in a gen 2 or PF series (gen 3) Glock. So, I don't know if they slightly changed the geometry of the Gen 5 trigger housing. it also scraped the heck out of my brass. This resulted in having a hard seat of the mag, brass scraping the ejector (underside) and pressure on the trigger housing. The Gen 5 is wider (top/bottom, side view), is NOT angled, clears the mag, but does NOT clear the rounds. The later Gen 4 (what I now use in all my Glocks) is wider (top/bottom, side view) but is angled to clear the mag/rounds. The 2-early 4 ejectors are thin (top/bottom, side view) and clear the mag/rounds. Well, after reading this thread I decided to try the Gen 5 ejector. So that one (and all the rest of my Glocks too) got the Gen 4 ejector installed and work great. I replaced that with another 336, but didn't like it. I first noticed my ejection pattern going haywire wtih my Gen 2 after thousands of rounds. I run the Gen 4 ejectors in all my Glocks (gen 2's, PF940c's, PF940sc's).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |